Started by jcorrea-lawyer, March 11, 2013, 13:44:15
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: jcorrea-lawyer on March 11, 2013, 13:44:15The judgment has date of 21st february 2013 and was notified to my colleague, Miguel Rodríguez with whom I have collaborated during the last three years on Timeshare cases, on the 8th of March. It basically says the same as in previous judgements of 28 september and 19 october 2012, where the Court of Appeal considered null and void the contracts, based on numerous breaches of the Law 42/98 such as selling weeks in perpetuity. It considered the contract totally and absolutely null, not subject to prescription. There were two contracts involved in this proceeding, one of 7 dicember 2000 and other of 28 de marzo 2001. Now Anfi will have to return the money to the clients around 18.600,00 pounds plus the solicitors fees.Another very interesting legal issue is that this judgment, again, clearly states that is ilegal to receive any anticipated money, not only during the 10 days' cooling off period, but during the three months referred to by article 11 of Law 42/98. This money cannot, under any circumstances, be received by means of a Trustee. This was what Anfi used to do using "Continental Trustees Limited" until the new Spanish Timeshare Law came into effect last March 2012, and the ban was already undisputable.If you wish more information you can visit my site timesharelawyer.es or send me a PM
Quote from: lawnmower60 on March 11, 2013, 21:36:02Is your colleague Miguel Rodriguez who works for Canarian Legal Alliance that works with Reclaim GC and all of its companieshttp://canarianlegalalliance.com/index.phpAnd your site does not seem to have any contact address on it http://www.correaguimera.com/pages/timeshare-lawyer