Started by jcorrea-lawyer, May 06, 2013, 18:48:32
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Carolinian on May 06, 2013, 21:47:52This snotty behavior by the developer at Anfi is something that gives timesharing a bad name. There is no legitimate reason for them to set up their rules to screw their owners like this. One thing it does it devalue Anfi weeks for resale as who would want to buy under those conditions?I wonder if there is a conflict between these new rules and the terms of what Anfi originally sold, and if so if Anfi could be taken to court on that. If so, they should be since what Anfi is doing is immoral and unethical.I understand Anfi also pulls the same despicable stunt as Silverpoint in trying to make it difficult for members to use independent exchange companies.
Quote from: jcorrea-lawyer on May 08, 2013, 11:23:10Perhaps this issue could bring grounds for legal challenge, declaring those clauses null and void. Membership to AVC is part of the selling package. It is included as part of the Terms and Conditions in each contract (see clause 12), those same Terms that allow owners to sell their rights (see clause 19). But if Anfi does not allow resale owners to became members, then Anfi is devaluing my contract. Nothing has been included nor in the Terms & Conditions, nor in the AVC enrollment form about this restriction. There is a clear discrimination and this is based on undisclosed grounds, which make you think that they are there just for Anfi's own benefit. This should therefore receive judicial sanction.
Quote from: Norm de Plume on May 08, 2013, 14:01:12Would appear to be a clear breach of contract by Anfi, but what is the appropriate jurisdiction on the contract?
Quote from: Spyke on August 06, 2013, 21:52:00Thank you so much for your reply, I will try to contact other members to see if we can move this forward, any further communication I receive from Anfi I will post on here. Thanks again.