Started by Mavo, October 14, 2009, 16:58:27
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
quote:Originally posted by tonycMavoYou say: "The government would insist that any failings would have to be self policed. TATOC would probably be expected to police this."Who - precisely - would expect TATOC to police this? Please explain precisely what official Government accreditation TATOC have with reference to the appropriate official directives! Let us stick to the authority TATOC have; not the authority they (or you) might like them to have.
quote:Originally posted by Mavo Forget quangos. Funding is already being drastically cut to the existing ones and many are having to amalgamate to survive. Help the Aged and Age Concern are two of the more recognisable ones to recently join forces. In the absence of any other consumer led body that I know of then TATOC are the only ones who could realistically run this scheme. (*I note that you offered no alternative). TATOC are already working with government agencies and Brussels so at the moment they seem to be the only ones with their feet under government tables. I have said earlier in posts around this seminar when people have questioned things. "I have no interest in past performance as it has no tangible influence on future achievement"
quote:Originally posted by MavoI will continue to support anyone who is at least making some kind of effort, however feeble that effort may be.